58% of 1012 adults polled by Differentology for the IAB UK said that mobile ads were better or more acceptable when they were easy to skip or avoid – followed in a list of other criteria by ads that were unobtrusive (52%) and that didn’t slow the page from loading (52%).
But the results also suggest that the goals of programmatic advertising may be less significant than many in the industry think; just 35% of respondents said they would find mobile advertising more acceptable if the ads they saw were relevant to them.
Slightly more (40%) said mobile ads could be improved by being simple and clear about what is being advertised.
The study found that 10% of consumers currently block ads on their mobile devices – but these are far more likely to be millennials, who account for more than six in ten of those than do.
But the good new for advertisers is that almost four out of five respondents accepted that ads had a role to play in funding free internet content.
Mike Reynolds, IAB UK’s mobile and video manager, said: "Getting mobile ads right is a delicate balance – even consumers have mixed feelings about what they like. For instance, ads with higher impact can be more annoying, while relevant ads based on location or behaviour are welcomed but may raise privacy concerns.
"With higher impact comes higher risk but the golden rules involve common sense – don’t hijack the user experience (78% "can’t stand" ads that take over the whole screen) and don’t omit, or make it difficult to find, the ad close/skip button, which inevitably annoys people."
No comments:
Post a Comment