About me

Agustin Gutierrez
mail:agbazaco@gmail.com
https://www.linkedin.com/in/agustingutierrezbazaco

Tuesday, 24 May 2016

7 ways publishers can survive in an ad blocked web

thedrum.com
PageFair and publisher trade body Digital Content Next (DC), along with the FT plus FireFox creator Mozilla, are seeking to help the media industry better navigate their way around ‘the blocked web’ – a term they’ve collectively coined due to increased user uptake of ad blocking.
This has taken the guise of a series of roundtable talks in multiple territories across the world, with attendees including such esteemed names as Google, the European Commission, the UK Government and the World Economic Forum, along with stakeholders from each tier of the advertising industry*.
In addition, trade bodies such as the World Federation of Advertisers (WFA), magazine trade body FIPP, plus the vehemently anti-ad blocking NAA have participated in the series of roundtables where other interests such as Mozilla, and the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) have also been present.  
The moral maze that has become the ad blocking debate divides opinion in the industry. On one side are those who claim the rise of the software is a result of the abusive tendencies of the ad tech industry, while on the other there are those espousing a zero-tolerance approach.
However, with estimates claiming that there are currently over 200 million users of ad blockers in the world (and rising), with the impact in terms of lost advertising dollars costing publishers $22bn last year, the need to grasp the nettle is clear.  
In a blog post published today (23 May) PageFair’s Dr. Johnny Ryan says a broad consensus from the disparate group of roundtable attendees* can be summarised in the points outlined below, and further suggests they may form the basis of the IAB’s anti-ad blocking guidelines L.E.A.N.
Even as blocking of advertising harms publishers, it also creates a new set of opportunities. Ad blocking has created a part of the web called ‘the blocked web’ where virtually all ads are blocked, he says. “Even so, the technology exists to display ads on the blocked web in a manner that ad blockers cannot circumvent.”
How to approach the blocked web
1. On the blocked Web the user must have immediate tools to reject and to complain about ads.
2. Rather than restore all ads on the blocked web only a limited number of premium ad slots should be restored. This will make a better impact for brands, plus clean up the user experience.
3. The blocked web may provide the opportunity to establish a new form of above the line advertising.
4. Contextual targeting can be used on the blocked web to establish ad relevance if other forms of tracking are not practical.
5. On the blocked web, where third-party tracking is largely blocked, publishers can create new value by engaging with their users to elicit volunteered data.
6. Measuring advertising success on the blocked web with broader top-of-funnel metrics may incentivise buyers to focus on value rather than cheapness. This means metrics such as ‘engagement time’ can be unified across digital and non-digital media.
7. On the Web as a whole there should be a maximum pageload time standard that publishers and advertisers both commit to. The growing hazard of ad blocking may incentivise this.
The outcomes have been published and the industry is awash with reports that Google itself is working on a definitive tech solution for ad blocking on course for launch next year, although the companies itself has yet to comment publicly on the situation.
Just how much the seven above points will influence the eventual solution Google is believed to be developing remains to be seen, although it should be noted that Google (somewhat controversially) also pays to be whitelisted by AdBlock Plus, raising further question marks over its eventual fix for the question.   
However, the proposals have not been met with universal approval, with privacy advocate Alexander Hanff voicing his displeasure via Twitter directly with PageFair's Ryan, with the legal watchdog apparently threatening legal action (see below).
AlexanderHanffComplaintAgainstPageFair

Myth busting: What people get wrong most often about programmatic

digiday.com
robot banner
The top minds in programmatic advertising are gathered in New Orleans this week at the Digiday Programmatic Summit to discuss the challenges and opportunities facing them as ad tech evolves. Brands, publishers and agencies are all on hand to dig deep into the focus on quality data and ads, and programmatic’s role beyond display advertising.
We took the opportunity to ask five of them one question: What is the biggest myth about programmatic advertising today? From data to viewability to the human touch, they each offered a different perspective
Jeff Rasp, director of digital strategy, Bayer
You can’t have access to your data. It’s really one of the biggest challenges and one of the biggest myths. In fact, as you start to look at the right partners, data is at your fingertips. And with data you become empowered to be a really smart marketer.
Sarah Greenberg, manager of programmatic marketing, Netflix
Either click-through-rate or viewability as a useful metric. I’m not sure there are a lot advertisers that are still talking about that as a metric. But at Netflix they’re completely useless. On mobile, smaller screens and fat thumbs, clicking on an ad may not mean what it would on a desktop. Since the majority of our traffic is skewing toward mobile, looking at that as a metric just doesn’t make sense.
Nichola Perrigo, associate director of digital marketing, RPA
Its biggest myth is that it’s shitty remnant inventory. It can be quality depending on the eye of the beholder.
Evan Adlman, head of programmatic, Condé Nast
The biggest myth about programmatic advertising is that there’s no human intervention needed to get it done. That’s the biggest myth. It’s completely false. Ford used to think that they provided the best product because they were painted by hand. They couldn’t scale that. So they built robots that now paint the cars by hand. But there are still people that need to be hired to operate the robots to paint the cars.
Tony Pribyl, programmatic strategist, eBay
That viewability is measured the same way across various research vendors, publishers, ad agencies. The change in methodology between those three factions is making the important fourth faction — which is clients that haven’t brought their money over to programmatic — very skeptical because it’s not a big mystery what a GRP is. It’s a huge mystery what a viewable ad is. That’s a crime, you can call it a myth, that we spend a lot of time congratulating ourselves for cleaning up non-human traffic and click fraud when the real problem is that we don’t have bigger mid-funnel marketing budgets coming over. I think that’s because we can’t even define our metrics well.

The ad formats that drive results

adnews.com.au
Yahoo7 has investigated which ad formats are best at driving certain objectives, identifying that specific formats are better when it comes to hitting particular brand goals than others.
After conducting a study which was established based on a research model from US, it was found that display formats were best at achieving cognitive engagement, whereas sponsored content and video formats were better at tapping into emotional and behavioural engagement.
Commercial director for Yahoo7, Paul Sigaloff, says: “Advertisers should use these insights to strategically decide which combination of formats will effectively deliver return on their investment.”
The study is apart of Yahoo7's 'Insight Series' and it was found that for campaigns seeking a cognitive response, such as gaining consumer attention, interest or awareness, rich media display and video delivered the most effective results.
It was also found that rich media display formats were better at achieving correct branding, while video most effectively generated spontaneous awareness.
The research consisted of a series of experiments from more than 1,000 respondents across Australia.
The research also demonstrated billboard and MREC formats are most powerful when employed together, while content is most effective when sponsored by display advertising.
“FMCG customers are researching and preparing for their shopping through a wide range of channels, as well as being on mobile in-store, so it’s imperative brands are selecting the right channels and formats to achieve engagement,’ Sigaloff added

Why Header Bidding Is Good For Buyers And Sellers In The Long Run

mediapost.com

I get a lot of questions from clients and partners about header bidding: What is it? Are we doing it? What value does it add?
To summarize: header bidding is enabled when a publisher places code, provided in most cases by a supply-side partner (SSP), in the page header. This code activates a request for bids from all demand-side platforms (DSP) before calling the publisher’s ad server.  Think about it as a “pre-auction.”
This implementation, and some of the philosophy behind it, are all in response to inefficiencies in the way that sell-side decisions occur in most publisher ad-serving systems.  Mass migration to header bidding in the publisher community and some swift product responses from SSPs indicate one thing to me:  This direction we are heading -- no pun intended-- has some benefit to the ecosystem. But we have some work to do to realize the full potential.
The core benefit to header bidding is creating a more unified auction for each impression, through which direct demand competes more readily alongside auction-based demand.  The theory being: More competition is better for everyone.
Taking a step back, sell-side decisions are typically made in sequence: Do this, then do that.  This is the aforementioned “waterfall.”  Header bidding increases competition for each impression, opening up a more effective avenue for auction-based bids to participate higher up in the food chain.
Climbing the waterfall
There are quite a few unique aspects to header bidding.  For buyers, we now often see requests for 100% of the publisher’s inventory, and to more effectively compete on price at higher priority in the publisher ad server.  Depending on the publisher’s implementation, programmatic buyers can effectively climb to the top of the waterfall and compete alongside direct demand with their auction-based bids.  This opens up a whole new world to the buy side.  Not only do we have an improved ability to forecast available inventory, but we can also start to compete for every single impression.  These are foundational pieces of the unified auction.
On the publisher side, each seller effectively has no limit to the number of partners that they can add to their header line-up.  Nuances and latency concerns aside, one immediate benefit to sellers is increased competition for each impression, leading to improved yield.  Publishers benefit through higher CPMs, and advertisers get access to more inventory.  This happens because supply isn’t locked into delivering direct-sold inventory when someone on the open market might bid higher, revealing the impression’s true value.  
Rather than calling demand sources individually based on a predetermined priority line, publishers can solicit demand simultaneously from each of their header partners.  DSPs automatically participate because all of the set-up work is done on the sell side.
In this case, what’s good for publishers is good for the entire programmatic ecosystem, because it allows everyone involved to discover the true value of an impression.
Header-bidding concerns to keep in mind
Because it’s up to the publisher to implement, an early argument against header bidding was that it was too complex to code and keep organized. Header bidding wrappers quickly emerged to help publishers standardize, reduce the workload on a publisher’s ad ops team, and bring SSPs more easily into the fold as a partner.
Lastly, one common complaint on the buy side is that there is no differentiation between header-enabled requests and open-market requests.  The lack of a signal to the buyer creates challenges for DSPs to effectively value those impressions.
As always, the marketplace will likely course-correct, as the aforementioned challenges continue and as new roadblocks emerge. Header bidding is the first step toward the preferred end state of programmatic advertising: a fully transparent marketplace where buyers have access to all classes of supply, sellers are able to maximize yield, and everyone gets to truly compete for each impression.  Although other speed bumps will likely develop, the bulk of ad placements will eventually transact through auctions.
Header bidding represents major progress toward this end state. Though it offers publishers the most immediate benefits, buyers have a major stake in the long-term success of a unified auction

Monday, 23 May 2016

Bringing data into creativity in a programmatic world

econsultancy.com/


Advertisers love the sexy “big idea” for creative branding campaigns.
And therein lies the fundamental aversion to getting down into the detail and considering the potential advantages offered by data.
Data isn’t sexy, consequently, it isn’t loved by brand advertisers. In their minds, data is the preserve of the far less noble direct marketing realm.
The idea of putting data at the core of campaigns, which the direct marketer does, is an anathema to the brand advertiser.
A neat illustration of this thinking is through personalised advertising. Brand marketers can’t deny that they’d like to connect with us all individually.
The “Share a Coke” campaign in which cans and bottles were personalised was a huge brand success.
Around 1,000 name variations were available on shelves and over 500,000 available through the online store.
So, why do brand advertisers seem reticent to deploy personalisation techniques online – a media tailor-made for such activity due to data?
Why do we so rarely see good examples of this type of campaign in the digital environment?

Falling in love with data?

The answer to the previous question is branding’s lack of love for data. However, this mind-set could be changing due to a couple of factors.
Brands love TV because it’s a wonderful platform to tell stories at scale.
In comparison, online platforms for telling good brand stories at scale using data and creative have been more constrained.
With smaller screen sizes and more limited ad ‘real estate’, brand banner advertising is more of a challenge.
However, the skills and appetite for meeting this challenge and using data efficiently are increasing.
Share a Coke Bottles
This improvement in the banner format is combining with a growth in other branding-type formats in display advertising, such as video and native advertising.
The IAB’s latest digital ad spend figures showed both video and native spend grew around 50% last year to account for nearly half of display ad spend.
These two parallel developments in display prove its increasing allure as a branding medium - FMCG advertisers, historically considered the least relevant in regards to online ads, are now the dominant spender on display, accounting for nearly £1 in every £5.
We’re seeing this increasing willingness to embrace data manifested by clients taking control of their data destiny.
A number of high profile brands are taking on long-term software contracts with data management platforms (DMPs), showing the appetite clients have to both control and exploit the data opportunity.

Programmatic plumbing

Alongside the rise in online branding formats, the other factor changing mind-sets among brand advertisers, rather surprisingly, could be programmatic.
Something originally seen as even less sexy than data.
The “plumbing”, or logistics, side of programmatic is becoming less of an obstacle to using data and creative to tell a good brand story.
The amount of heavy-lifting required is reducing in terms of time, resources and money among agencies and vendors to connect the data, the creative and the inventory.
Consequently, there’s a growing sense of enthusiasm about take-up among brands.
So, as programmatic matures, many of these growing pains are less pronounced.
As the plumbing between creative, data and buying becomes more automated, it means the industry can move more towards programmatic as a creative solution.

Programmatic as creative

In turn, programmatic creative has become more advanced and more flexible, without compromising scale and automation, to meet the specific creative requirements and nuances that advertisers have for being able to tell their brand story.
Programmatic creative is now flexible and advanced enough to insert dynamic and personalised elements into online ads to enable the idea of “mass personalisation”, which was essentially what the big idea “Share of Coke” brand campaign was shooting for.
These developments hopefully thaw the relationship between brand marketers and data, particularly as they open up exciting and innovative brand campaign ideas that can be brought to life in this brave new world.
Take, for example, Netflix’s campaign to promote the addition of all ten seasons of Friends to its library.
Conceived by Ogilvy Paris, it’s a pre-roll video campaign that responds dynamically to videos watched on YouTube by inserting a clip from Friends that relates to the video topic searched for.

Essentially, it uses data to relate Friends to almost anything you search for on YouTube.

3 Advanced Strategies to Supercharge Your Facebook Ads

business2community.com
As a marketer, you see it and your customers feel it: the ever-present shift from offline to online interactions. Marketing budgets are getting more fragmented and complicated — and that means marketers must get smarter about how they spend every marketing dollar.
To be successful, marketers need to aim for less messaging waste and more precise targeting.
Martin Gilliard, Global Head of MarTech and Data Partnerships, spoke about this need to scale personalization in advertising at Salesforce Connections. Martin explained how Facebook has reinvented advertising, but before those ads can be used effectively, marketers need to know what to do with all that technology.
Here, check out three advanced Facebook ad strategies straight from Facebook’s martech and data partnerships leader.

1. Leverage custom audiences.

How it works: Use customer data (either direct or third party), CRM data, and intent data to advertise on Facebook. That way, every Facebook ad you send is targeting a customer you already know. With every piece of data, you get closer to your perfect customer match — meaning your advertising reaches the people you already know will respond.
Martin explained, “Customers don’t demand great experiences. They expect them. They give you information, and it’s up to you to use it.” The chance to create a positive experience becomes negative when ads are overdone or poorly targeted, so leverage custom audiences instead.

2. Improve lead quality with Facebook lead ads.

How it works: Lead forms are crucial to many marketers’ programs (especially in the B2B world), but getting customers to fill out teeny-tiny, multitudinous forms on a mobile device can feel like pulling teeth. Instead, promote the same landing page for a deliverable, whitepaper, or offer through a Facebook ad. Facebook will then auto-populate the form with what it already knows about the customer.
As the marketer and advertiser, you get quality customer data; you remove the biggest barrier to a customer filling out a form; and the customer has an easier time navigating straight to your offer. Martin recommends Facebook lead ads to any advertisers looking to increase the quality of their leads.

3. Tap into the audience network.

How it works: Want to reach real people on and off Facebook? Facebook ads aren’t just for Facebook itself. Marketers can extend their reach into many high-quality mobile apps by tapping into Facebook’s audience network. If you already know how to set up a Facebook ad, you’re all set. Just use the same Facebook advertising tools to achieve similarly supercharged results on other apps.
Not convinced yet? Here’s how Facebook explains the audience network: “Even though these ads aren’t running on Facebook, they take advantage of all things that make Facebook ads great—all the targeting, measurement and the other tools that work so well for our advertisers. Currently, the Audience Network is limited to mobile app install ads, mobile app engagement ads, website conversion ads and website click ads.”
People-based marketing can truly transform your business — and Facebook ads are a great place to get closer to your customer, because Facebook connects with over 1.65 billion people all over the world. And because Facebook is inherently mobile, it’s an ideal place to start spending your ad money where customers actually spend their time.

After 60 Years in Advertising, I Believe True Creativity Is More Powerful Than Ever

adweek.com
Creative power transformed an ugly little German car into the most popular import of its time.
A good thing about getting old in this business is that you've actually lived through all the changes and survived the perennial predictions of ad agency extinction.
Along the way you've also observed, maybe even been a part of, any number of power shifts. But when I was asked by Adweek's editors to contribute a few lines about the evolution of power within our industry, my thoughts went immediately to the one thing that's remained constant throughout my 60 years in the business: creative power—the power of an idea to transform the meaning, and thus the fortunes, of brands.
Keith Reinhard Headshot: Alex Fine
In the '50s, it was creative power, certainly not horsepower, that transformed an ugly little German car into the most popular import of its time. Creativity gave the Volkswagen Beetle a winning countercultural identity, a feature no engineer could add. Years later, it was the power of a one-word urban greeting—"Wassup"—that lent youth and hipness to an aging Budweiser, and caused its brewer to state publicly, "In our lifetimes, we'll never see so much value created from a single idea!"
More recently, a former wide receiver for an NFL practice squad urged us to "Smell Like a Man, Man," turning a sleepy deodorant, Old Spice, into an international phenomenon. Those are just three examples of the wonder-working power of creative ideas developed by agencies partnering with great clients over the years.
There is power in partnership, and I sometimes lament the passing of the kind of partnerships we once enjoyed when CEOs of agencies had close, top-to-top relationships with their client counterparts. David Ogilvy said, "Chairmen should harangue chairmen." The president of the Minnesota Valley Canning Company said, "I want the little guy with the rumpled suit," meaning Leo Burnett himself, who, in turn, gave his new client a much jollier Green Giant. Bill Bernbach could tell Edgar Bronfman he was wrong about a headline suggestion for Chivas Regal, and it was Bill's close relationships with Carl Hahn at Volkswagen and Bob Townsend at Avis that resulted in advertising that changed advertising forever.
But in time, many CEOs gave up their responsibility as ultimate brand managers and transferred their decision-making power from the corner office to the office of a chief marketing officer. Some of these CMOs not only embraced the power of creativity but also advanced its cause within their organizations and our industry. Jim Stengel at P&G was one of the first to lead a delegation of his execs to the International Festival of Creativity at Cannes, an initiative that other clients soon followed, seeking to better understand the creative process and its brand-building powers.
There were other CMOs however, who exercised their new powers to create a wasteful churn of agency reviews and change, not for the sake of creativity, but apparently for the sake of change itself. In that process, valuable brand equities and powerful long-running campaigns were often lost or abandoned. Such losses give credence to the boast of the late Rosser Reeves, chairman of the Ted Bates agency and father of the unique selling proposition (USP), who promised he could beat you with the third-best campaign because you'd keep changing and he wouldn't. How many readers today know the Avis tagline that four years ago replaced the long-running and still relevant "We Try Harder"?
The mid-'80s saw a consolidation of power in the agency world touched off by the brothers Saatchi who seemed to be doing a deal a week. Our idea in 1986 for the three-agency merger that formed Omnicom was to amass unequalled creative power to better serve clients across the globe. The media called it "The Big Bang," after which other consolidations soon followed. Today, agencies of the five big holding companies dominate the advertising and marketing landscape, as well as the stages where creative excellence is honored.
Not long after the merger mania had subsided, full-service agencies experienced a damaging loss of power when media buying was shifted to separate, independent firms which promised clients unparalleled clout. Some observers now say this clamor for low-cost GRPs underestimated the rise of the internet and, in turn, the importance of digital and mobile advertising where the lines between content and connection are blurred. For many of us, losing the media function came at a time when, in response to the proliferation of media channels, we in the agencies were elevating the media practice and joining it with our creative resources. I'm with those calling for a reintegration of the two disciplines, however such a reunion might occur.
Another flashback reminds us that beginning in 1948 and continuing until the late 1980s, the big three networks dominated U.S. television—controlling the vast majority of advertising and pretty much determined what Americans watched, and when. Conventional wisdom holds that the power to choose now resides with consumers. But one could argue that this presumed power is an illusion, given that six media giants now control almost all of what we watch, read or listen to. The introduction of the internet in the '80s led to the digital disruption later in the century. This in turn has become an unrelenting tsunami of technical innovation, with each wave bringing us new creative possibilities.
As marketers, however, we need to make sure that these disruptions don't become distractions, taking focus away from building enduring brands.
Inside our own companies, technology allows us to easily connect with each other and with our clients from any point on the globe. But as with all technical advances, this benefit comes at a cost, most notably the power of presence—physical human presence. The synergy that results from team members interacting with each other in the same place at the same time cannot be matched by teams whose members are all working from different, often far-flung locations. And all the emails in the world will never substitute for real live managers walking the halls and offering a word of encouragement or genuine appreciation. It's easy to underestimate the power of being there and caring. It can inspire great work or even turn a life around.
Where will technology take us? VR and AI offer awesome, perhaps fearsome, possibilities. Some predict that machines, already composing news stories without any human involvement, will soon be originating our creative content, replacing our people and their talents. I question that prediction if for no other reason than that machines, for all their intelligence, still lack the power of passion, without which, according to the German philosopher Hegel, nothing great has ever been accomplished.
Now that the big legacy agencies are up to speed with the newest technology and specialist skills offered by the startup shops born during the great digital disruption, we'll likely see another cycle of agency consolidation. Clients will encourage this consolidation as they discover the advantages of partnering with a new definition of full-service agencies.
But within those agencies, instead of power residing only at the top of an outdated organizational chart, we'll see flatter, more flexible organizations that quickly form and reform in response to fast-changing needs. Decision-making power will be more broadly distributed to on-the-ground operatives able to act and react quickly and creatively to real-time opportunities. Leaders will be reminded that the best way to gain power is to give it away—to the right people.
And some of those people may well represent a new blend of generalist and specialist skills: perhaps a Leonard Bernstein-like advertising composer, arranger, synergist and conductor, all in one person. And given what scientists are telling us about who's best at multitasking, that person is likely to be a woman.
In any case, we're sure to see a lot more power placed in the hands of women. The many panels we've all sat through addressing the subject will finally establish a marketing world where talent truly has no gender. As for diversity and inclusion, I like what DDB's Wendy Clark said at the recent 4A's conference: "We will not rest until our company reflects the marketplace we serve."
We'll also see a fresh appreciation and application of the power of story, especially as neuroscientists are giving us new evidence that telling a good brand story is better for the bottom line than presenting rational arguments. As Peter Guber, the Hollywood producer and former CEO of Sony Pictures, put it, "In this age of rapid technological change, it's not the 0s and 1s of the digital revolution, but rather the oohs and aahs of a good story that offer the best chance of compelling listeners to act on behalf of a worthy goal."
The power of story was given even more importance by Joe Nye, former dean of Harvard's Kennedy School for Government, when he wrote: "Conventional wisdom has always been that the government with the largest military prevails, but in an information age it may be the state (or nonstate) with the best story that wins." The same goes for brands.
Some scholars, perhaps channeling Mahatma Gandhi, make a distinction among three kinds of power: "power over," "power to" and "power with." "Power over" is the ability to dominate a person or a group. "Power to" is the ability to do something on one's own, relying on one's intellect, knowledge and stamina. But "power with" is the ability to work with others to accomplish a common goal.
In our business, power will always reside with those who have the money. But in the future, as in the past, clients have a choice in how to use power. They can use their "power over" to intimidate, scare or starve their agencies, or they can use their "power with" to partner with agencies to unleash the kind of creative power that can make their brands rich and famous.
Not too long ago, I enrolled in a class on Basic Content Strategy at the General Assembly in New York. The instructor was younger than any of my kids. But in my attempt to stay current, I just might go back and take a class in writing code. As Bernbach said, "The future, as always, belongs to the brave." I'm not sure how much future I have left in advertising, but given these exciting times—were it in my power—I'd sign up for another 60 years.
Every Wednesday for 20 years, Keith Reinhard (@kreatividad), chairman emeritus of DDB Worldwide, sent out a memo to the global agency he ran that offered up pieces of wisdom. The memos became known as Any Wednesday, which is the title of a recently published book cataloging the insights. Reinhard was also the recipient of the 2015 Lifetime Achievement Award from Clio.